Reyes v. 44-45 Broadway Realty Co.

2026 NY Slip Op 30794(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedMarch 2, 2026
DocketIndex No. 156976/2024
StatusUnpublished
AuthorLeslie A. Stroth

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 30794(U) (Reyes v. 44-45 Broadway Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reyes v. 44-45 Broadway Realty Co., 2026 NY Slip Op 30794(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

Reyes v 44-45 Broadway Realty Co. 2026 NY Slip Op 30794(U) March 2, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156976/2024 Judge: Leslie A. Stroth Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1569762024.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/13/2026 3:45:56 PM] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/06/2026 11:56 AM INDEX NO. 156976/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/06/2026

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. LESLIE A. STROTH PART 12M Justice -------------------X INDEX NO. 156976/2024 DENICE NUNEZ REYES, MOTION DATE 11/26/2025 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 -v- 44-45 BROADWAY REALTY CO., MCDONALD'S DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendant. -------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,27,28 were read on this motion to/for AMEND CAPTION/PLEADINGS

Plaintiff commenced this action after sustaining injuries due to a trip and fall. Plaintiff

moves, without opposition, for leave to serve and file an Amended Summons and Amended

Verified Complaint, adding P. Hendel Products Partnership, and Team Hendel Products, LLC, as

party-defendants, and to amend the caption accordingly.

Pursuant to CPLR § 3025(b), "A party may amend his or her pleading, or supplement it

by setting forth additional or subsequent transactions or occurrences, at any time by leave of

court or by stipulation of all parties. Leave shall be freely given upon such terms as may be just.

Any motion to amend or supplement pleadings shall be accompanied by the proposed amended

or supplemental pleading clearly showing the changes or additions to be made to the pleading."

"In general, motions for leave to amend a pleading should be granted unless the proposed

amendment is palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit, or where the delay in seeking the

amendment would cause prejudice or surprise" (Corwise v Lefrak Org., 93 A.D.3d 754 [2 nd Dept

2012]). "Prejudice requires that the '[opposing party] has been hindered in the preparation of his 156976/2024 NUNEZ REYES, DENICE vs. 44-45 BROADWAY REALTY CO. ET AL Page 1 of4 Motion No. 001

[* 1] 1 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/06/2026 11:56 AM INDEX NO. 156976/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/06/2026

case or been prevented from taking some measure in support of his position."' (RCLA, Inc. v 50-

09 Realty, LLC, 48 A.D.3d 538,539,852 NYS2d 211 [2d Dept 2008], quoting Loomis v Civetta

Corinna Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18, 23,444 NYS2d 571,429 N.E.2d 90 [Ct App 1981]).

In MBIA Ins., the Court held that "on a motion for leave to amend, [a party] need not

establish the merit of its proposed new allegations, but simply show that the proffered

amendment is not palpably insufficient or clearly devoid of merit" (MBIA Ins. Corp. v.

Greystone & Co., 74 A.D.3d 499 [l st Dept 2010]; see also Cruz v. Brown, 129 A.D.3d 455

[1 st Dept 2015]).

Plaintiff's Motion is granted. The proposed amendment seeks to add two parties as

Defendants who "had a contract to perform certain work at the subject premises," or who

otherwise owned, operated, maintained, controlled, or managed the premises of Plaintiff's injury

(Plaintiffs Affirmation, NYSCEF Doc. No 22 at 2; Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, NYSCEF

Doc. No. 26 at 6-7). These allegations are not palpably insufficient or clearly devoid of merit.

Moreover, there is no basis to find prejudice or surprise. Here, there is no evidence that

Defendants will suffer any material disadvantage if Plaintiff is permitted to amend her pleading.

To the contrary, allowing the amendment ensures that all potentially responsible parties are

before the Court and promotes the full and fair adjudication of Plaintiffs claims. Plaintiff's

motion for leave to amend is granted in its entirety.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint pursuant to CPLR

§ 3025(b) is granted; and it is further

156976/2024 NUNEZ REYES, DENICE vs. 44-45 BROADWAY REALTY CO. ET AL Page2of4 Motion No. 001

[* 2] 2 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/06/2026 11:56 AM INDEX NO. 156976/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/06/2026

ORDERED that the amended summons and amended verified complaint annexed to

Plaintiff's moving papers shall be deemed served upon personal service of a copy of this order

with notice of entry upon all parties who have appeared in the action; and it is further

ORDERED that a supplemental summons and amended complaint, in the form annexed

to Plaintiff's moving papers, shall be served, in accordance with the Civil Practice Law and

Rules, upon the additional parties in this action within 30 days after service of a copy of this

order with notice of entry; and it is further

ORDERED that the action shall bear the following caption:

-------------------X DENICE NUNEZ REYES,

Plaintiff,

-v- 44-45 BROADWAY REALTY CO., MCDONALD'S, P. HENDEL PRODUCTS PARTNERSHIP, and TEAM HENDEL PRODUCTS, LLC

Defendant.

-------------------X

And it is further

ORDERED that counsel for the moving party shall serve a copy of this order with notice

of entry upon the County Clerk (60 Centre Street, Room 141B) and the Clerk of the General

Clerk's Office (60 Centre Street, Room 119), who are directed to mark the court's records to

reflect the parties being added pursuant hereto; and it is further

ORDERED that such service upon the County Clerk and the Clerk of the General Clerk's

Office shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse

156976/2024 NUNEZ REYES, DENICE vs. 4445 BROADWAY REALTY CO. ET AL Page 3 of4 Motion No. 001

[* 3] 3 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/06/2026 11:56 AM INDEX NO. 156976/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/06/2026

and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page

on the court's website at the address [www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh]).

The foregoing constitutes the decision and order of the Court.

3/2/2026 DATE ~TH CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION J.S.C. GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE

156976/2024 NUNEZ REYES, DENICE vs. 44-45 BROADWAY REALTY CO. ET AL Page4of4 Motion No. 001

[* 4] 4 of 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.
429 N.E.2d 90 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
RCLA, LLC v. 50-09 Realty, LLC
48 A.D.3d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
MBIA Insurance v. Greystone & Co.
74 A.D.3d 499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Corwise v. Lefrak Organization
93 A.D.3d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Cruz v. Brown
129 A.D.3d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 30794(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-v-44-45-broadway-realty-co-nysupctnewyork-2026.