Reyes-Solorio v. Holder
This text of 366 F. App'x 852 (Reyes-Solorio v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Juan Manuel Reyes-Solorio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s decision denying his request for a continuance. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion for continuance. Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Reyes-Solorio’s motion to continue because Reyes-Solorio’s eligibility for adjustment of status was speculative. See id. at 1247 (denial of a motion to continue was not an abuse of discretion where relief was not immediately available to petitioner).
We lack jurisdiction to review Reyes-Solorio’s unexhausted due process claim regarding the denial of a continuance. See Serrano v. Gonzales, 469 F.3d 1317, 1319 (9th Cir.2006).
*853 PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
366 F. App'x 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-solorio-v-holder-ca9-2010.