Reyes, Ruben Alejandro
Opinion
ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), 68.5, because it contains an incomplete copy of the opinion of the court of appeals, and the petition exceeds 15 pages.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.
Filed: October 31, 2012
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reyes, Ruben Alejandro (Reyes, Ruben Alejandro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.