Reyes-Mota v. Ashcroft
This text of 76 F. App'x 159 (Reyes-Mota v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Carlos Reyes-Mota, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination that he was not eligible for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence and will uphold the decision unless the evidence compels a contrary result. Hernandez-Montiel v. INS, 225 F.3d 1084, 1090-91 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.
The IJ properly denied Reyes-Mota’s request for asylum and withholding of removal because he did not establish that there was more than a generalized or random possibility of his future persecution in Guatemala. See Kotasz v. INS, 31 F.3d 847, 852-54 (9th Cir.1994).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 F. App'x 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-mota-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.