Reyes Construction Inc. v. Pankaj (p.K.) Patel & Rravin Bhakta

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2009
Docket13-08-00703-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Reyes Construction Inc. v. Pankaj (p.K.) Patel & Rravin Bhakta (Reyes Construction Inc. v. Pankaj (p.K.) Patel & Rravin Bhakta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reyes Construction Inc. v. Pankaj (p.K.) Patel & Rravin Bhakta, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00703-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

REYES CONSTRUCTION, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

PANKAJ (P.K.) PATEL & RRAVIN BHAKTA, APPELLEES. _____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Reyes Construction, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered

against it in favor of appellee, Pankaj (P.K.) Patel & Rravin Bhakta. On January 6, 2009,

the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was

originally due on January 5, 2009, and that the deputy district clerk, Christina Tusa, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's

record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken

to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant

was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt

of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 26th day of February, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reyes Construction Inc. v. Pankaj (p.K.) Patel & Rravin Bhakta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-construction-inc-v-pankaj-pk-patel-rravin-bh-texapp-2009.