Reyes

652 F.2d 70, 227 Ct. Cl. 586, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 145
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMarch 13, 1981
DocketNo. 542-80T
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 652 F.2d 70 (Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reyes, 652 F.2d 70, 227 Ct. Cl. 586, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 145 (cc 1981).

Opinion

Plaintiff, pro se, filed a petition in this court on October 6, 1980, for refund of income tax for 1977 and interest thereon totaling $333.53, which amount she paid on May 12, 1980. Plaintiff contends that she is a victim of possible discrimination for failure of the Internal Revenue Service to allow her claims for dependency exemptions for her parents on a head-of-household basis. Defendant moves to dismiss the [587]*587petition on the ground that plaintiff has not met the jurisdictional requirement of filing with the Internal Revenue Service an administrative claim for refund pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 7422, which claim it appears she is entitled to file on or before May 12, 1982, that being within the 2-year period after payment provided for in I.R.C.§ 6511(a).

The provisions of I.R.C. § 7422(a) clearly support defendant:

Ño suit or proceeding shall be maintained in any court for the recovery of any internal revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected, or of any penalty claimed to have been collected without authority, or of any sum alleged to have been excessive or in any manner wrongfully collected, until a claim for refund or credit has been duly filed with the Secretary or his delegate, according to the provisions of law in that regard, and the regulations of the Secretary established in pursuance thereof.

Unless such a claim is filed, we have no jurisdiction. See also Treas. Reg. § 301.6402-2.

it is therefore ordered, without hearing oral argument, that defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and the petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walsh v. United States
3 Cl. Ct. 539 (Court of Claims, 1983)
Lyle v. United States
2 Cl. Ct. 250 (Court of Claims, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
652 F.2d 70, 227 Ct. Cl. 586, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-cc-1981.