Reyburn v. Casey

Supreme Court of Missouri

Reyburn v. Casey

31 Mo. 252

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedOctober 15, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 31 Mo. 252 (Reyburn v. Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reyburn v. Casey, 31 Mo. 252 (Mo. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Ewing, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case, as now presented by the record, involves no question not decided when the case was here before. (29 Mo. 129.) The only point then was the propriety of an instruction, asked by the plaintiff and refused by the court, to the effect that the lapse of five years was no bar to an action on the instrument sued on, but that it might be brought at any time within ten years. This involved the construction of the instrument, and we see no reason for changing the conclusion to which we then arrived.

Judgment affirmed;

the other judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ewing, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case, as now presented by the record, involves no question not decided when the case was here before. (29 Mo. 129.) The only point then was the propriety of an instruction, asked by the plaintiff and refused by the court, to the effect that the lapse of five years was no bar to an action on the instrument sued on, but that it might be brought at any time within ten years. This involved the construction of the instrument, and we see no reason for changing the conclusion to which we then arrived.

Judgment affirmed;

the other judges concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Mo. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyburn-v-casey-mo-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack