Reybold v. Denny
53 A. 55, 19 Del. 589, 3 Penne. 589, 1902 Del. LEXIS 22
This text of 53 A. 55 (Reybold v. Denny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reybold v. Denny, 53 A. 55, 19 Del. 589, 3 Penne. 589, 1902 Del. LEXIS 22 (Del. Ct. App. 1902).
Opinion
Hilles for defendant moved that judgment be refused, notwithstanding the affidavit of demand, because it nowhere appeared in the same that the cause of action sued upon was a “book account,” and contended that the paper attached thereto was not a “ copy of a book entry,” as required by Rev. Code (1893), Chap. 106, Sec. 4, p. 790.
Judgment refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
53 A. 55, 19 Del. 589, 3 Penne. 589, 1902 Del. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reybold-v-denny-delsuperct-1902.