Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State
This text of Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State (Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00336-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
REY ESQUIVEL D/B/A ESQUIVEL BAIL BONDS, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Rey Esquivel d/b/a Esquivel Bail Bonds, filed an appeal from a
judgment rendered against him in favor of appellee, The State of Texas. On June 5,
2012, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause
was originally due on April 23, 2012, and that the deputy district clerk, Freddy Cardoza,
had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could
be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).
Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date
of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.
On June 5, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent in
remitting a $175.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal
was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of
receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).
Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notices and has failed to pay the
filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 12th day of July, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rey-esquivel-dba-esquivel-bail-bonds-v-state-texapp-2012.