Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 8, 2006
Docket13-06-00206-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State (Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-06-206-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________

REY ESQUIVEL D/B/A ESQUIVEL BAIL BONDS,              Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                              Appellee.

                On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

                           of Cameron County, Texas

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

              Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, REY ESQUIVEL D/B/A ESQUIVEL BAIL BONDS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-CCL-1430-B.  Judgment in this cause was signed on April 27, 2005.  A timely motion for new trial was filed on May 20, 2005.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on July 26, 2005, but was not filed until March 27, 2006. 

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed.  To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 8th day of June, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rey Esquivel D/B/A Esquivel Bail Bonds v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rey-esquivel-dba-esquivel-bail-bonds-v-state-texapp-2006.