Rexford Garland Cassidy v. B.C. Counts, Captain, Thomas Israel, Warden, Kurt Fox, Doctor, Edward C. Morris, Edward W. Murray, Officer Alfred

929 F.2d 691, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4664, 1991 WL 37112
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 22, 1991
Docket91-6508
StatusUnpublished

This text of 929 F.2d 691 (Rexford Garland Cassidy v. B.C. Counts, Captain, Thomas Israel, Warden, Kurt Fox, Doctor, Edward C. Morris, Edward W. Murray, Officer Alfred) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rexford Garland Cassidy v. B.C. Counts, Captain, Thomas Israel, Warden, Kurt Fox, Doctor, Edward C. Morris, Edward W. Murray, Officer Alfred, 929 F.2d 691, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4664, 1991 WL 37112 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

929 F.2d 691
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Rexford Garland CASSIDY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
B.C. COUNTS, Captain, Thomas Israel, Warden, Kurt Fox,
Doctor, Edward C. Morris, Edward W. Murray,
Officer Alfred, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6508.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1991.

Decided March 22, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr., District Judge. (CA-88-55-H)

Rexford Garland Cassidy, appellant pro se.

William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Sandra Morris Holleran, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Rexford Garland Cassidy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cassidy v. Counts, CA-88-55-H (W.D.Va. Dec. 21, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 F.2d 691, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4664, 1991 WL 37112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rexford-garland-cassidy-v-bc-counts-captain-thomas-israel-warden-ca4-1991.