Rexer v. Sklar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rexer v. Sklar

277 A.D.2d 216, 715 N.Y.S.2d 341, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 6, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated December 13, 1999, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that triable issues of fact exist which preclude the granting of partial summary judgment to the plaintiff on the issue of liability (see, CPLR 3212; Young v Mauch, 268 AD2d 583). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated December 13, 1999, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that triable issues of fact exist which preclude the granting of partial summary judgment to the plaintiff on the issue of liability (see, CPLR 3212; Young v Mauch, 268 AD2d 583). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Rexer v. Sklar, 277 A.D.2d 216, 715 N.Y.S.2d 341, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

277 A.D.2d 216 (Rexer v. Sklar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related