Rexer v. Sklar

277 A.D.2d 216, 715 N.Y.S.2d 341, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 A.D.2d 216 (Rexer v. Sklar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rexer v. Sklar, 277 A.D.2d 216, 715 N.Y.S.2d 341, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated December 13, 1999, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that triable issues of fact exist which preclude the granting of partial summary judgment to the plaintiff on the issue of liability (see, CPLR 3212; Young v Mauch, 268 AD2d 583). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perla v. Wilson
287 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 216, 715 N.Y.S.2d 341, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rexer-v-sklar-nyappdiv-2000.