Rexer v. Rexer

18 A.D.2d 935, 238 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4376
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 18, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 935 (Rexer v. Rexer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rexer v. Rexer, 18 A.D.2d 935, 238 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

In an action by the plaintiff wife for a separation, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 15, 1961 (a) which directs him to pay to plaintiff $500 as a counsel fee to enable her to defend his appeal to this court from the order in this action dated July 26, 1961; and (b) which directed him to pay the plaintiff’s printing costs on said appeal. Order, dated September 15, 1961, modified by striking out the provision directing the payment of the printing costs. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Defendant’s time to pay the $500 counsel fee is extended until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. By this court’s decision on the companion appeal from the order of July 26, 1961 (see Rexer v. Rexer, 18 A D 2d 935) plaintiff will become entitled to recover her printing costs. Hence, the provision in the order of September 15, 1961 for the payment of such costs should be deleted to avoid any duplication of payments or directions. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

F.L.C. v. E.W.P.
49 A.D.2d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.2d 935, 238 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rexer-v-rexer-nyappdiv-1963.