Rex v. Rex

56 A.2d 872, 142 N.J. Eq. 192, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 651
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.2d 872 (Rex v. Rex) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rex v. Rex, 56 A.2d 872, 142 N.J. Eq. 192, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 651 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have examined the record and the briefs of counsel, and are of the opinion that the order appealed from should be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colib, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.2d 872, 142 N.J. Eq. 192, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rex-v-rex-nj-1948.