Rex v. Rex
56 A.2d 872, 142 N.J. Eq. 192, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 651
Opinion
We have examined the record and the briefs of counsel, and are of the opinion that the order appealed from should be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colib, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rex v. Rex, 56 A.2d 872, 142 N.J. Eq. 192, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 651 (N.J. 1948).
56 A.2d 872 (Rex v. Rex) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.