Rex v. Coney Island & Brooklyn Railroad
This text of 146 A.D. 924 (Rex v. Coney Island & Brooklyn Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Hirschberg, J., dissented, upon the ground that' having reversed the judgment against the Long Island Railroad Company for reasons stated in the per curiam opinion (ante, p. 905),, they deem it wiser to have a new trial as to both defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 A.D. 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rex-v-coney-island-brooklyn-railroad-nyappdiv-1911.