Revive Medical Distribution LLC v. Bradley B. Bailey, M.D. and Roger B. Schechter, M.D., INC.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJanuary 7, 2026
Docket2:25-cv-02632
StatusUnknown

This text of Revive Medical Distribution LLC v. Bradley B. Bailey, M.D. and Roger B. Schechter, M.D., INC. (Revive Medical Distribution LLC v. Bradley B. Bailey, M.D. and Roger B. Schechter, M.D., INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Revive Medical Distribution LLC v. Bradley B. Bailey, M.D. and Roger B. Schechter, M.D., INC., (D. Nev. 2026).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3) REVIVE MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION LLC, Case No.: 2:25-cv-02632-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of 5} v. Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Striking Certificate of Interested Parties BRADLEY B. BAILEY, M.D. and ROGER B. SCHECHTER, M.D., INC., 7 Defendants 8 I ORDER that by January 20, 2026, plaintiff Revive Medical Distribution LLC must 9 show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 10 Because Revive is a limited liability company, it is a citizen of every state in which each of its 1] members is a citizen. See Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 12 (9th Cir. 2006) (stating that “an LLC is a citizen of every state of which its owners/members are 13 citizens”). Revive has not identified the citizenship of each of its members, so it has not 14 established that complete diversity exists between it and the defendant in this case. Failure to 15 respond to this order by January 20, 2026 will result in the case being dismissed without 16 prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 17 I FURTHER ORDER that Revive’s certificate of interested parties (ECF No. 2) is 18 STRICKEN for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). The certificate 19 does not identify the plaintiff's citizenship as required by that rule. 20 I FURTHER ORDER that Revive shall file a proper certificate of interested parties by 21 January 20, 2026. 22 DATED this 7th day of January, 2026. OIEnR-. 23 ANDREW P. GORDON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Revive Medical Distribution LLC v. Bradley B. Bailey, M.D. and Roger B. Schechter, M.D., INC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/revive-medical-distribution-llc-v-bradley-b-bailey-md-and-roger-b-nvd-2026.