Revitz v. Terrell

611 So. 2d 1293, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13021, 1992 WL 387639
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1992·No. No. 92-138·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Robert Revitz, appeals from a final judgment in favor of the defendants, Roy A. Terrell, Jr., Charlyne S. Terrell, A.F. “Jerry” Egan, Inc.1 and Faye Buchanan, entered by the trial court upon [1294] remand. The plaintiff also appeals from the trial court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees to the defendants in the amount of $181,000.00. We reverse.

We reverse based on our conclusion that the trial court upon remand did not follow the law of the case established in Revitz v. Terrell, 572 So.2d 996 (Pla. 3d DCA 1990). See Wood v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Dentistry, 490 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Brunner Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 452 So.2d 550 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment entered in favor of the defendants and the order awarding attorneys’ fees to the defendants, and remand with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Reversed and remanded.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Revitz v. Terrell, 611 So. 2d 1293, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13021, 1992 WL 387639 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

611 So. 2d 1293 (Revitz v. Terrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Revitz v. Terrell
627 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)