Revitz v. Terrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Revitz v. Terrell

611 So. 2d 1293, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13021, 1992 WL 387639

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 29, 1992

DocketNo. 92-138

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 611 So. 2d 1293 (Revitz v. Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Revitz v. Terrell, 611 So. 2d 1293, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13021, 1992 WL 387639 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Robert Revitz, appeals from a final judgment in favor of the defendants, Roy A. Terrell, Jr., Charlyne S. Terrell, A.F. “Jerry” Egan, Inc.¹ and Faye Buchanan, entered by the trial court upon [1294]*1294remand. The plaintiff also appeals from the trial court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees to the defendants in the amount of $181,000.00. We reverse.

We reverse based on our conclusion that the trial court upon remand did not follow the law of the case established in Revitz v. Terrell, 572 So.2d 996 (Pla. 3d DCA 1990). See Wood v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Dentistry, 490 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Brunner Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 452 So.2d 550 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment entered in favor of the defendants and the order awarding attorneys’ fees to the defendants, and remand with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Robert Revitz, appeals from a final judgment in favor of the defendants, Roy A. Terrell, Jr., Charlyne S. Terrell, A.F. “Jerry” Egan, Inc.¹ and Faye Buchanan, entered by the trial court upon [1294]*1294remand. The plaintiff also appeals from the trial court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees to the defendants in the amount of $181,000.00. We reverse.

We reverse based on our conclusion that the trial court upon remand did not follow the law of the case established in Revitz v. Terrell, 572 So.2d 996 (Pla. 3d DCA 1990). See Wood v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Dentistry, 490 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Brunner Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 452 So.2d 550 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment entered in favor of the defendants and the order awarding attorneys’ fees to the defendants, and remand with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

611 So. 2d 1293, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13021, 1992 WL 387639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/revitz-v-terrell-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack