Revitz v. Revitz

435 So. 2d 404, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21763
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1983·No. No. 83-1489·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the order entered below on the wife’s motion for temporary relief. Gilbert v. Gilbert, 105 So.2d 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); see Vickers v. Vickers, 413 So.2d 788 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Revitz v. Revitz, 435 So. 2d 404, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21763 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

435 So. 2d 404 (Revitz v. Revitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vickers v. Vickers
413 So. 2d 788 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Gilbert v. Gilbert
105 So. 2d 379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)