Revis v. Kelly

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided April 30, 2021·No. 6:19-cv-01490·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

DAMON CYRIL REVIS, Case No. 6:19-cv-1490-YY Petitioner, ORDER v. BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent.

The Court has received notice that petitioner Damon Cyril Revis has passed away. Notice, ECF 41. Respondent has filed a Motion to Dismiss. ECF 42. Because petitioner is deceased, there is no remedy that he can obtain through this habeas action. See McMann v. Ross, 396 U.S. 118 (1969) (remanding to district court following the habeas petitioner’s death “with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus as moot”). Accordingly, respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 42) is GRANTED and this case is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED April _30_, 2021.

Wiuchal U/) Woeaman _ Michael W. Mosman United States District Judge

ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Revis v. Kelly, (D. Or. 2021).

Revis v. Kelly (Revis v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMann v. Ross
396 U.S. 118 (Supreme Court, 1969)