Reverend Tommie R. Smith, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Malcom v. Leach

Fifth Circuit

Reverend Tommie R. Smith, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Malcom v. Leach

468 F.2d 624

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 8, 1972

Docket27659

StatusPublished

This text of 468 F.2d 624 (Reverend Tommie R. Smith, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Malcom v. Leach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reverend Tommie R. Smith, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Malcom v. Leach, 468 F.2d 624 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

468 F.2d 624

Reverend Tommie R. SMITH, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Malcom V. LEACH et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 27659.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1972.

Howard Moore, Jr., Peter E. Rindskopf, Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Allen L. Chancey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Ga., Atlanta, Ga., Robert V. Zener, Patricia S. Baptiste, Attys., William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Civil Div., Donald Horowitz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

It having been made known to the court that appellant Smith has been granted a dependency deferment and is not eligible for induction under current Selective Service policies, the appeal in this cause is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

468 F.2d 624

Reverend Tommie R. SMITH, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Malcom V. LEACH et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 27659.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1972.

Howard Moore, Jr., Peter E. Rindskopf, Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Allen L. Chancey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Ga., Atlanta, Ga., Robert V. Zener, Patricia S. Baptiste, Attys., William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Civil Div., Donald Horowitz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

It having been made known to the court that appellant Smith has been granted a dependency deferment and is not eligible for induction under current Selective Service policies, the appeal in this cause is dismissed as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 F.2d 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reverend-tommie-r-smith-individually-and-on-behalf-of-all-others-ca5-1972.