Revels v. Shockley

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 18, 2003
• Docket: 03-6511
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6511

JOSEPH SAMUEL REVELS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

IRA SHOCKLEY, Warden and others; ATLANTIC GENERAL HOSPITAL and others,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-3549-1-WMN)

Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 18, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Samuel Revels, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock Karpinski, ALLEN, KARPINSKI, BRYANT & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland; Curtis Henry Booth, COWDREY, THOMPSON & KARSTEN, Annapolis, Maryland; Stephen B. Awalt, JENKINS & AWALT, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Joseph Samuel Revels appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Revels v.

Shockley, No. CA-02-3549-1-WMN (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2003). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED