Revelone, Inc. v. Arlind Realty Corp.
273 A.D. 874, 77 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5055
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 1, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
On the present state of the record, summary judgment dismissing the complaint should not have been granted. We do not determine the sufficiency of the writings now in the record to satisfy the requirements of section 259 of the Real Property Law. Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the motion denied. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 958.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Revelone, Inc. v. Arlind Realty Corp., 273 A.D. 874, 77 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5055 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).
273 A.D. 874 (Revelone, Inc. v. Arlind Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Da Silva v. Musso
150 A.D.2d 73 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Revelone, Inc. v. Arlind Realty Corp.
274 A.D. 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)