Reuther, Pets v. DE County Bureau of Elections

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Reuther, Pets v. DE County Bureau of Elections

180 A.3d 366

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 8, 2018

Docket743 MAL 2017 (Granted)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 A.3d 366 (Reuther, Pets v. DE County Bureau of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reuther, Pets v. DE County Bureau of Elections, 180 A.3d 366 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issue, rephrased for clarity:

Does the failure of a write-in candidate or other candidate who obtains access to the ballot other than through the filing of a nomination petition to timely file a Statement of Financial Interests, as required by 51 Pa.Code § 15.3(e), constitute a "fatal defect," precluding the appearance of the candidate's name on the ballot?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issue, rephrased for clarity:

Does the failure of a write-in candidate or other candidate who obtains access to the ballot other than through the filing of a nomination petition to timely file a Statement of Financial Interests, as required by 51 Pa.Code § 15.3(e), constitute a "fatal defect," precluding the appearance of the candidate's name on the ballot?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 A.3d 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reuther-pets-v-de-county-bureau-of-elections-pa-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack