Reuther, Pets v. DE County Bureau of Elections

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Reuther, Pets v. DE County Bureau of Elections

180 A.3d 366

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 8, 2018·No. 743 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issue, rephrased for clarity:

Does the failure of a write-in candidate or other candidate who obtains access to the ballot other than through the filing of a nomination petition to timely file a Statement of Financial Interests, as required by 51 Pa.Code § 15.3(e), constitute a "fatal defect," precluding the appearance of the candidate's name on the ballot?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issue, rephrased for clarity:

Does the failure of a write-in candidate or other candidate who obtains access to the ballot other than through the filing of a nomination petition to timely file a Statement of Financial Interests, as required by 51 Pa.Code § 15.3(e), constitute a "fatal defect," precluding the appearance of the candidate's name on the ballot?

Reuther, Pets v. DE County Bureau of Elections, 180 A.3d 366 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

180 A.3d 366 (Reuther, Pets v. DE County Bureau of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related