Home/Supreme Court/Reuter v. Wisconsin ex rel. Department of Agriculture

Reuter v. Wisconsin ex rel. Department of Agriculture

314 U.S. 571, 62 S. Ct. 76
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 13, 1941
DocketNo. 185
StatusPublished

This text of 314 U.S. 571 (Reuter v. Wisconsin ex rel. Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reuter v. Wisconsin ex rel. Department of Agriculture, 314 U.S. 571, 62 S. Ct. 76 (1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file statement of jurisdiction is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Highland Farms Dairy v. Agnew, 300 U. S. 608, 612; (2) Nebbia v. New York, 291 U. S. 502; Borden’s Co. v. Ten Eyck, 297 U. S. 251; United States v. Rock Royal Co-op., 307 U. S. 533, 562-71; Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota, 226 U. S. 157.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota
226 U.S. 157 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Nebbia v. New York
291 U.S. 502 (Supreme Court, 1934)
BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.
297 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. Agnew
300 U.S. 608 (Supreme Court, 1937)
United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.
307 U.S. 533 (Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
314 U.S. 571, 62 S. Ct. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reuter-v-wisconsin-ex-rel-department-of-agriculture-scotus-1941.