Reuter v. Price

Fourth Circuit

Reuter v. Price

155 F. App'x 646

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2005·No. No. 05-1900·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jose F. Reuter appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reuter v. Price, No. CA-05-1996-CCB (D.Md. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jose F. Reuter appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reuter v. Price, No. CA-05-1996-CCB (D.Md. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reuter v. Price, 155 F. App'x 646 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

155 F. App'x 646 (Reuter v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related