Reuter v. Household Finance Corp.
This text of 269 A.D. 976 (Reuter v. Household Finance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed. Defendant should have judgment, with costs in' the Municipal Court action which has been consolidated with the plaintiffs’ action in the Supreme Court. The statement delivered to plaintiffs by defendant was sufficient to comply with the statute (Banking Law, § 353; Rimpotti v. Household Finance Corp., 266 App. Div. 778; Di Nome v. Personal Finance Co. of New York, 291 N. Y. 250). Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 976, 59 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reuter-v-household-finance-corp-nyappdiv-1945.