Reuter v. Courtyards of the Grove Condominium Ass'n

785 So. 2d 687, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6659, 2001 WL 514316
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2001·No. No. 3D00-561·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 718.116(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2000); Ralph v. Envoy Point Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 455 So.2d 454, 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)(“Simply because necessary work for maintenance may also constitute alterations or improvements does not nullify a condominium board’s authority and duty to maintain the condominium common elements.”); Tiffany Plaza Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. Spencer, 416 So.2d 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)(same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reuter v. Courtyards of the Grove Condominium Ass'n, 785 So. 2d 687, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6659, 2001 WL 514316 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

785 So. 2d 687 (Reuter v. Courtyards of the Grove Condominium Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tiffany Plaza Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Spencer
416 So. 2d 823 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Ralph v. Envoy Point Condo. Ass'n
455 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)