Reuter v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
115 A.D. 911, 101 N.Y.S. 1141
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1906
StatusPublished
This text of 115 A.D. 911 (Reuter v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reuter v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad, 115 A.D. 911, 101 N.Y.S. 1141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
Opinion
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to receive the declaration of the motorman, made after the accident, to the effect that there was no gong on the car. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
115 A.D. 911, 101 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reuter-v-brooklyn-heights-railroad-nyappdiv-1906.