Reusens v. Girard
162 A.D. 906
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 162 A.D. 906 (Reusens v. Girard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reusens v. Girard, 162 A.D. 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Motion granted; question to be certified on settlement of order. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Alfred J. Schwabe and Others v. Aladar W. Hertzog. Motions denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 A.D. 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reusens-v-girard-nyappdiv-1914.