Reuschenberg v. Huntington
599 N.E.2d 690, 80 N.Y.2d 801, 587 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1747
This text of 599 N.E.2d 690 (Reuschenberg v. Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reuschenberg v. Huntington, 599 N.E.2d 690, 80 N.Y.2d 801, 587 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1747 (N.Y. 1992).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Board of Education v. Christa Construction, Inc.
608 N.E.2d 756 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
599 N.E.2d 690, 80 N.Y.2d 801, 587 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reuschenberg-v-huntington-ny-1992.