Reuschel v. State of Florida
This text of Reuschel v. State of Florida (Reuschel v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-3153 _____________________________
MICHAEL REUSCHEL,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
June 17, 2024
PER CURIAM.
The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on the merits.
ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Luke Newman of Luke Newman, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reuschel v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reuschel-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.