Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc.

922 F.2d 197, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22964, 1990 WL 254399

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 925 F.2d 703 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 1990·No. No. 88-2641·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon a request for a poll of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc of Food Chemical News, a majority of the judges in regular active service having voted to rehear the case en banc,

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the decision of the panel shall be, and the same hereby is, vacated.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk set the same for en banc hearing at the first convenient opportunity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon a request for a poll of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc of Food Chemical News, a majority of the judges in regular active service having voted to rehear the case en banc,

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the decision of the panel shall be, and the same hereby is, vacated.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk set the same for en banc hearing at the first convenient opportunity.

Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc., 922 F.2d 197, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22964, 1990 WL 254399 (4th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

922 F.2d 197 (Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.