Reuben v. Andorsky
This text of 15 N.Y.S. 317 (Reuben v. Andorsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant criticises the affidavit of the respondent used upon the motion. The appeal-book does not show that any objection was to the affidavit at the special term. However, we are of the opinion that the criticism is not controlling. We think the affidavit was not fatally defective. We have had occasion to express our views in Gilbert v. Cart Co., 15 N. Y. Supp. 316, (decided at this term, see opinion of Hardin, P. J.,) upon the subject of the criticism made to the affidavit, as well as upon the rule applicable to motions of this character. After a careful examination of the affidavits used on either side, we are of the opinion that we ought not to interfere with the discretion exercised at the special term. We therefore sustain its order. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.Y.S. 317, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reuben-v-andorsky-nysupct-1891.