Retterer v. Whirlpool Corp.

715 N.E.2d 568, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1465, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2873
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 1, 1999
Docket99-818
StatusPublished

This text of 715 N.E.2d 568 (Retterer v. Whirlpool Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Retterer v. Whirlpool Corp., 715 N.E.2d 568, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1465, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2873 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Marion App. No. 9-98-55. Discretionary appeal allowed and motion for admission pro hoc vice of David J. Parsons and Shanthi V. Gaur by Thomas A. Frericks granted.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
715 N.E.2d 568, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1465, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/retterer-v-whirlpool-corp-ohio-1999.