Retamal v. United States Customs & Border Prot.

2006 CIT 70
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedMay 11, 2006
Docket1:97-s-00260
StatusPublished

This text of 2006 CIT 70 (Retamal v. United States Customs & Border Prot.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Retamal v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 2006 CIT 70 (cit 2006).

Opinion

Slip Op. 06 - 70

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x SERGIO U. RETAMAL, : Plaintiff, : v. Court No. 03-00613 : U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, :

Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

Memorandum & Order

Dated: May 11, 2006

AQUILINO, Senior Judge: Pursuant to this court's slip

opinion 04-149, 28 CIT (Nov. 24, 2004), final judgment was

entered, dismissing this action. Upon subsequent denial of a mo-

tion for rehearing per slip opinion 05-15, 29 CIT (Feb. 3,

2005), the originally-pro-se plaintiff's adoptive counsel prose-

cuted an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal

Circuit, which handed down a decision that concluded:

The judgment of the United States Court of Interna- tional Trade is vacated in part, reversed in part, and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss.

Sergio U. Retamal & John J. Galvin v. U.S. Customs & Border Pro-

tection, 439 F.3d 1372, 1378 (Fed.Cir. 2006).

That court's judgment issued as a mandate on April 27,

2006 to the foregoing effect causes this court to reaffirm that all Court No. 03-00613 Page 2

that its judgment did on November 24, 2004 was to do what the

appellate remand now seemingly requires, to wit, dismiss this

action.

Ergo, it is once again so ordered.

Dated: New York, New York May 11, 2006

Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr. Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2006 CIT 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/retamal-v-united-states-customs-border-prot-cit-2006.