Retaka Romeo Nelson v. Shannon Brochette Nelson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 6, 2015·No. 01-13-00816-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 01-13-00816-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/6/2015 2:21:11 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

NO. 01-13-00816-CV

In The FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS First District Court of Appeals of Texas HOUSTON, TEXAS at Houston 7/6/2015 2:21:11 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Retaka Romeo Nelson, Appellant vs. Shannon Brochette Clerk Nelson, Appellee

On Appeal From

District Court No. 308, Cause 2012-04063

Harris County, Texas

EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

TO THE HONORABLE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellant requests this court stay consideration of his pending motion for en

banc reconsideration, pending the outcome of his 1) pending motion to remand for

lost or destroyed records, and 2) his pending motion for leave to supplement. The

remand and supplement motions would be mooted by this court’s premature ruling

on the pending en banc motion for reconsideration. Appellant would be harmed if

he is precluded from the relief within both motions, which are both subject to

inclusion into the pending motion for en banc reconsideration by amendment or

supplementation. This motion was filed in good faith to establish due-order-of-

pleadings, and not for the sake of delay or harassment.

1 Conclusion

This court should grant Appellant’s emergency request to stay consideration

of his pending motion for en banc reconsideration, so that it can first consider his

pending motion to remand for lost or destroyed records, and his pending motion

for leave to supplement, in due-order-of-pleadings.

Prayer

WHEREFORE, Appellant prays that the Court grant the relief requested

herein and such further relief, at law or in equity, to which it may be entitled.

Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Retaka Nelson Retaka Nelson P.O. Box 7367 Los Angeles, CA 90007 Tel: (832) 590-9295 Email: thetakesta@gmail.com Appellant-Petitioner, Pro Se

Certificate of Compliance

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 9.4, I hereby certify that the number of words in

this document are 408. I have relied on the word count of the computer program

used to prepare the document.

/s/ Retaka Nelson Retaka Nelson

2 Certificate of Conference

In that Shannon’s appellate counsel is opposed to Appellant’s pending

motion to remand for lost or destroyed records, and his pending motion for leave to

supplement, it is suffice to infer that she opposes this motion to stay.

Certificate of Service

I certify that a true copy of all documents herein was served in accordance

with Tex. R. App. P. 9.5 on each party as follows:

Shari Goldsberry Via E-Serve on 7/6/2015 Texas Bar No. 24038398 Marina Bay Dr. Suite #108 League City, TX 77573 Ph: (281) 533-3030 Fx: (281) 533-3033 Email: shari@goldsberrylaw.com Attorney for Appellee, Shannon Nelson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Retaka Romeo Nelson v. Shannon Brochette Nelson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Retaka Romeo Nelson v. Shannon Brochette Nelson (Retaka Romeo Nelson v. Shannon Brochette Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.