Retaka Romeo Nelson v. Shannon Brochette Nelson
Opinion
ACCEPTED 01-13-00816-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/6/2015 2:21:11 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK
NO. 01-13-00816-CV
In The FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS First District Court of Appeals of Texas HOUSTON, TEXAS at Houston 7/6/2015 2:21:11 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Retaka Romeo Nelson, Appellant vs. Shannon Brochette Clerk Nelson, Appellee
On Appeal From
District Court No. 308, Cause 2012-04063
Harris County, Texas
EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY EN BANC RECONSIDERATION
TO THE HONORABLE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS:
Appellant requests this court stay consideration of his pending motion for en
banc reconsideration, pending the outcome of his 1) pending motion to remand for
lost or destroyed records, and 2) his pending motion for leave to supplement. The
remand and supplement motions would be mooted by this court’s premature ruling
on the pending en banc motion for reconsideration. Appellant would be harmed if
he is precluded from the relief within both motions, which are both subject to
inclusion into the pending motion for en banc reconsideration by amendment or
supplementation. This motion was filed in good faith to establish due-order-of-
pleadings, and not for the sake of delay or harassment.
1 Conclusion
This court should grant Appellant’s emergency request to stay consideration
of his pending motion for en banc reconsideration, so that it can first consider his
pending motion to remand for lost or destroyed records, and his pending motion
for leave to supplement, in due-order-of-pleadings.
Prayer
WHEREFORE, Appellant prays that the Court grant the relief requested
herein and such further relief, at law or in equity, to which it may be entitled.
Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Retaka Nelson Retaka Nelson P.O. Box 7367 Los Angeles, CA 90007 Tel: (832) 590-9295 Email: thetakesta@gmail.com Appellant-Petitioner, Pro Se
Certificate of Compliance
Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 9.4, I hereby certify that the number of words in
this document are 408. I have relied on the word count of the computer program
used to prepare the document.
/s/ Retaka Nelson Retaka Nelson
2 Certificate of Conference
In that Shannon’s appellate counsel is opposed to Appellant’s pending
motion to remand for lost or destroyed records, and his pending motion for leave to
supplement, it is suffice to infer that she opposes this motion to stay.
Certificate of Service
I certify that a true copy of all documents herein was served in accordance
with Tex. R. App. P. 9.5 on each party as follows:
Shari Goldsberry Via E-Serve on 7/6/2015 Texas Bar No. 24038398 Marina Bay Dr. Suite #108 League City, TX 77573 Ph: (281) 533-3030 Fx: (281) 533-3033 Email: shari@goldsberrylaw.com Attorney for Appellee, Shannon Nelson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Retaka Romeo Nelson v. Shannon Brochette Nelson (Retaka Romeo Nelson v. Shannon Brochette Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.