Retail Digital Network v. Jacob Appelsmith

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Retail Digital Network v. Jacob Appelsmith. Read the opinion of the Court — 810 F.3d 638
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 16, 2016·No. 13-56069·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 16 2016

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

RETAIL DIGITAL NETWORK, LLC, No. 13-56069

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No.

2:11-cv-09065-CBM-PJW

v. Central District of California, Los Angeles

TIMOTHY GORSUCH, as Director of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, ORDER

Defendant-Appellee.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be heard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3.

Judge Owens did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Retail Digital Network v. Jacob Appelsmith, (9th Cir. 2016).

Retail Digital Network v. Jacob Appelsmith (Retail Digital Network v. Jacob Appelsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.