Retail Clerks Local Union No. 381 v. National Labor Relations Board

348 F.2d 64
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Retail Clerks Local Union No. 381 v. National Labor Relations Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 327 F.2d 888
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 6, 1965·No. Nos. 17741, 17784, 17790·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Under date of December 19, 1963, we entered judgment 117 U.S.App.D.C. 190, 327 F.2d 888, enforcing the order of the Board in these cases except that insofar as the order was based in No. 17790 upon respondents therein “engaging in a lock-out while continuing to operate their establishments,” we reserved our decision and retained jurisdiction until further order of the court.

In light of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in N. L. R. B. v. Brown et al., 85 S.Ct. 980, the order of the Board insofar as applicable to No. 17790 is modified by deleting therefrom in paragraph 1(a) the requirement that the employers involved cease and desist from “engaging in a lock-out while continuing to operate their establishments.” As so modified the order will be enforced.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Retail Clerks Local Union No. 381 v. National Labor Relations Board, 348 F.2d 64 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

348 F.2d 64 (Retail Clerks Local Union No. 381 v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related