Reszka v. Reszka

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reszka v. Reszka

479 So. 2d 322

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 17, 1985

DocketNos. 84-2731, 85-330

StatusPublished

This text of 479 So. 2d 322 (Reszka v. Reszka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reszka v. Reszka, 479 So. 2d 322 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These appeals concern a failure to enforce a settlement agreement, an award of lump sum alimony and an award of partial attorney’s fees and costs. We find no error or abuse of discretion in any of the rulings by the trial court. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); McGregor v. McGregor, 447 So.2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Therefore the orders under review are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These appeals concern a failure to enforce a settlement agreement, an award of lump sum alimony and an award of partial attorney’s fees and costs. We find no error or abuse of discretion in any of the rulings by the trial court. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); McGregor v. McGregor, 447 So.2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Therefore the orders under review are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 So. 2d 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reszka-v-reszka-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack