Restucci v. Superior Court Department of Trial Court

701 N.E.2d 349, 428 Mass. 1019, 1998 Mass. LEXIS 556
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 9, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Rule 2:21 (2) requires that the petitioner “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The petitioner asserts that the Superior Court judge’s action “is in error and can not be viewed as harmless,” that he suffers “immediate and irreparable harm,” that there are “no other aspects of relief,” and the damages are irreparable. Nevertheless, the petitioner has not met his burden under the rule because he has not provided the requisite explanation why review on appeal, or by other available means, would be inadequate.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Restucci v. Superior Court Department of Trial Court, 701 N.E.2d 349, 428 Mass. 1019, 1998 Mass. LEXIS 556 (Mass. 1998).

701 N.E.2d 349 (Restucci v. Superior Court Department of Trial Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bentley v. Bentley, Unpublished Decision (9-27-2004)
2004 Ohio 5100 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)