Restucci v. Superior Court Department of Trial Court

701 N.E.2d 349, 428 Mass. 1019, 1998 Mass. LEXIS 556
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 9, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 701 N.E.2d 349 (Restucci v. Superior Court Department of Trial Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Restucci v. Superior Court Department of Trial Court, 701 N.E.2d 349, 428 Mass. 1019, 1998 Mass. LEXIS 556 (Mass. 1998).

Opinion

Rule 2:21 (2) requires that the petitioner “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The petitioner asserts that the Superior Court judge’s action “is in error and can not be viewed as harmless,” that he suffers “immediate and irreparable harm,” that there are “no other aspects of relief,” and the damages are irreparable. Nevertheless, the petitioner has not met his burden under the rule because he has not provided the requisite explanation why review on appeal, or by other available means, would be inadequate.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bentley v. Bentley, Unpublished Decision (9-27-2004)
2004 Ohio 5100 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 N.E.2d 349, 428 Mass. 1019, 1998 Mass. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/restucci-v-superior-court-department-of-trial-court-mass-1998.