Restrepo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Restrepo v. State

86 So. 3d 538, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5634, 2012 WL 1232014

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 2012

DocketNo. 2D11-4623

StatusPublished

This text of 86 So. 3d 538 (Restrepo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Restrepo v. State, 86 So. 3d 538, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5634, 2012 WL 1232014 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Paola Andrea Restrepo appeals the summary denial of her motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which the post-conviction court denied as untimely. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Paola Andrea Restrepo appeals the summary denial of her motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which the post-conviction court denied as untimely. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 So. 3d 538, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5634, 2012 WL 1232014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/restrepo-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack