Restrepo v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
This text of 92 A.D.3d 857 (Restrepo v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, assault, battery, and violation of civil rights based upon the defense afforded to merchants under General Business Law § 218. Since the defendant failed to eliminate all triable issues of fact as to whether it had reasonable grounds to detain the plaintiff, whether the detention was conducted in a reasonable manner, and whether the detention was for a reasonable duration, it failed to demonstrate its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing those causes of action (see General Business Law § 218; Sada v Kohl’s Dept. Stores, Inc., 79 AD3d 1121 [2010]; Muza v Niketown N.Y., 278 AD2d 13 [2000]; Haggerty v Federated Dept. Stores, 65 AD2d 617 [1978]). Accordingly, that branch of the defendant’s motion was properly denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Angiolillo, J.E, Leventhal, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 29 Misc 3d 1237(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 52185(U).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A.D.3d 857, 938 N.Y.2d 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/restrepo-v-home-depot-usa-inc-nyappdiv-2012.