Restrepo v. Carrera
This text of Restrepo v. Carrera (Restrepo v. Carrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 20, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D15-1964 Lower Tribunal No. 14-23417 ________________
Vivian Restrepo, Petitioner,
vs.
Seidy Carrera, Respondent.
A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Marin, Judge.
Bernstein, Chackman, Liss, and Neil Rose (Hollywood), for petitioner.
Ellsley Sobol, P.L., and Eric M. Ellsley (Plantation), for respondent.
Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.
FERNANDEZ, J.
Vivian Restrepo petitions this Court to review the trial court’s order
directing petitioner to “provide cell phone numbers and/or names of providers used during the six (6) hour period before the time of the crash and the six (6) hour
period after the crash, same to be provided within thirty (30) days from the date of
this Order.” Upon review of the petition and based on respondent’s concession of
error that the trial court’s order directing petitioner to reveal information regarding
her cell phone violates petitioner’s Fifth Amendment rights and constitutes a
departure from the essential requirements of law from which petitioner has no
adequate remedy on appeal, we grant the petition and quash the order requiring
petitioner to provide information regarding her cell phone number and her cell
phone carrier.
Petition granted; order quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Restrepo v. Carrera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/restrepo-v-carrera-fladistctapp-2016.