Restrepo v. Carrera

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 2016·No. 15-1964·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 20, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D15-1964

Lower Tribunal No. 14-23417

Vivian Restrepo,

Petitioner,

vs.

Seidy Carrera,

Respondent.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Marin, Judge.

Bernstein, Chackman, Liss, and Neil Rose (Hollywood), for petitioner.

Ellsley Sobol, P.L., and Eric M. Ellsley (Plantation), for respondent.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

Vivian Restrepo petitions this Court to review the trial court’s order directing petitioner to “provide cell phone numbers and/or names of providers used

during the six (6) hour period before the time of the crash and the six (6) hour period after the crash, same to be provided within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.” Upon review of the petition and based on respondent’s concession of error that the trial court’s order directing petitioner to reveal information regarding her cell phone violates petitioner’s Fifth Amendment rights and constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law from which petitioner has no adequate remedy on appeal, we grant the petition and quash the order requiring petitioner to provide information regarding her cell phone number and her cell phone carrier.

Petition granted; order quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Restrepo v. Carrera, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Restrepo v. Carrera (Restrepo v. Carrera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.