Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v. 21st Century Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 6, 2019
Docket2019 NYSlipOp 51961(U)
StatusPublished

This text of Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v. 21st Century Ins. Co. (Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v. 21st Century Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v. 21st Century Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion



Restoration Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Lopez, Candice, Appellant,

against

21st Century Insurance Company, Respondent.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell and Karina Barska of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Bryan M. Rothenberg (Sharon A. Brennan and Maryana Feigen of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered February 23, 2016. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs).

The record establishes that defendant's follow-up scheduling letter was mailed more than 10 days after plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for the first scheduled EUO. As a result, this follow-up scheduling letter was untimely (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.5 [b]). Consequently, defendant's motion should have been denied (see Parisien v 21st Century Ins. Co., 62 Misc 3d 150[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 50275[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2019]).

Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 6, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v. 21st Century Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/restoration-chiropractic-pc-v-21st-century-ins-co-nyappterm-2019.