Restoney Robinson v. Katherine Turner David G. Shofner Mike Thomson Chaplin Baker Aaron J. Johnson Captain Tingen Sergeant Talbert Sergeant Adams

977 F.2d 573, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 38401, 1992 WL 296313
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1992
Docket92-6804
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 977 F.2d 573 (Restoney Robinson v. Katherine Turner David G. Shofner Mike Thomson Chaplin Baker Aaron J. Johnson Captain Tingen Sergeant Talbert Sergeant Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Restoney Robinson v. Katherine Turner David G. Shofner Mike Thomson Chaplin Baker Aaron J. Johnson Captain Tingen Sergeant Talbert Sergeant Adams, 977 F.2d 573, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 38401, 1992 WL 296313 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

977 F.2d 573

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Restoney ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Katherine TURNER; David G. Shofner; Mike Thomson; Chaplin
Baker; Aaron J. Johnson; Captain Tingen;
Sergeant Talbert; Sergeant Adams,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-6804.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 28, 1992
Decided: October 16, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.

Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attoeney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Restoney Robinson appeals from the district court's order denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that there was no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Werner v. Carbo, 731 F.2d 204, 206 (4th Cir. 1984). We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spratley v. FCA US LLC
N.D. New York, 2020
Tomassini v. FCA US LLC
N.D. New York, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
977 F.2d 573, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 38401, 1992 WL 296313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/restoney-robinson-v-katherine-turner-david-g-shofner-mike-thomson-chaplin-ca4-1992.