Restaino v. Restaino
160 A. 345, 110 N.J. Eq. 563, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 819
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Moore.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Restaino v. Restaino, 160 A. 345, 110 N.J. Eq. 563, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 819 (N.J. 1932).
160 A. 345 (Restaino v. Restaino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martinique v. Martinique
141 A.2d 562 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Gilbert v. Gilbert
94 A.2d 863 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Sperling v. Sperling
89 A.2d 71 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Sabia v. Sabia
84 A.2d 559 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Soos v. Soos
185 A. 386 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)