Ressler v. Mahony
661 P.2d 1294, 99 Nev. 352, 1983 Nev. LEXIS 439
Opinion
[353]*353OPINION
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in respondents’ favor. Appellant, in his opening brief, contends that the district court erred in granting summary judgment because material issues of fact remained in dispute.
Respondents have filed an express confession of error. Cause appearing, and pursuant to this express confession of error, we hereby reverse the summary judgment of the district court and remand this matter for trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ressler v. Mahony, 661 P.2d 1294, 99 Nev. 352, 1983 Nev. LEXIS 439 (Neb. 1983).
661 P.2d 1294 (Ressler v. Mahony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Valley Health Sys., LLC v. Murray
Nevada Supreme Court, 2023