Ressler v. Mahony

661 P.2d 1294, 99 Nev. 352, 1983 Nev. LEXIS 439
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 29, 1983·No. No. 14389·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[353]*353OPINION

Per Curiam: 1

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in respondents’ favor. Appellant, in his opening brief, contends that the district court erred in granting summary judgment because material issues of fact remained in dispute.

Respondents have filed an express confession of error. Cause appearing, and pursuant to this express confession of error, we hereby reverse the summary judgment of the district court and remand this matter for trial.

Mowbray, J., Zenoff, Sr. J., and Fondi, D. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ressler v. Mahony, 661 P.2d 1294, 99 Nev. 352, 1983 Nev. LEXIS 439 (Neb. 1983).

661 P.2d 1294 (Ressler v. Mahony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valley Health Sys., LLC v. Murray
Nevada Supreme Court, 2023