Ressler v. Conners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ressler v. Conners

242 A.D. 896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 896 (Ressler v. Conners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ressler v. Conners, 242 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial upon two grounds: 1. That the trial court erred in refusing to permit plaintiff to testify as to when he discovered the fraud. The failure of plaintiff’s counsel to take an exception does not bar us from taking this error into account. 2. That plaintiff presented sufficient testimony to make out a prima facie case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial upon two grounds: 1. That the trial court erred in refusing to permit plaintiff to testify as to when he discovered the fraud. The failure of plaintiff’s counsel to take an exception does not bar us from taking this error into account. 2. That plaintiff presented sufficient testimony to make out a prima facie case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ressler-v-conners-nyappdiv-1934.