Ressinger v. Adler Mfg. Co.

92 F. Supp. 304, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2517
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky
DecidedAugust 7, 1950
DocketCiv. No. 1275
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 F. Supp. 304 (Ressinger v. Adler Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ressinger v. Adler Mfg. Co., 92 F. Supp. 304, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2517 (W.D. Ky. 1950).

Opinion

SHELBOURNE, District Judge. .

Plaintiff, Paul Ressinger, a resident of Illinois, filed this action January 15, 1947, against defendant Adler Manufacturing Company, a corporation created under the laws of Kentucky.

Plaintiff sought a judgment in the sum of $78,070, claimed to be due as a result of transactions between the parties concerning the manufacture by defendant of baby sulkies (referred to generally in the record and hereinafter as Kiddigigs), designed and marketed by plaintiff.

The requisite diversity in citizenship and amount in controversy being present, this Court has jurisdiction. Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(a) (1).

Various motions and numerous pre-trial conferences resulted in plaintiff filing on March 5, 1948, its amended and substituted complaint, resulting in re-pleading.

[305]*305A trial was had to the Court without the intervention of a jury, in February 1950.

Findings of Fact

1. Prior to June 1943, plaintiff designed a two-wheel baby cart or sulky, called a. “Kiddigig”, the novel feature of which was an absence of any metals except screws and nails necessary to join the parts together. Metal was in short supply, due to demands for the War.

2. June 26, 1943, plaintiff having previously submitted the design and specifications, placed an order with defendant for the manufacture of 6,000 Kiddigigs to be manufactured and packed in cartons and shipped to plaintiff’s customers on his orders at an agreed price of $3.50 per Kiddigig, f.o.b. Louisville, Kentucky.

Defendant accepted the order upon agreement that the plaintiff forward to defendant his check for $7,000 to be credited against the last one-third of this order manufactured and delivered by defendant, orders for the first two-thirds of the 6,000 Kiddigigs to be paid for on the 10th and 25th of each month until the first 4,000 had been shipped; payment on the last 2,000 to be credited by application of the $7,000 deposit.

Shipment on this order was completed about August 9th, on which date plaintiff ordered an additional 30,000 Kiddigigs of the same model, the price to be $3.60 per Kiddigig, so long as defendant had on hand a supply of cartons in which to pack the orders, after which it was contemplated the packing would be in wire-bound crates which would increase the price to plaintiff to $3.72 per Kiddigig.

The agreement was reduced to writing October 2, 1943, by acceptance by defendant of a letter addressed to it by plaintiff reciting the transactions up to that date and providing a working agreement for anticipated future orders.

It was recognized in this contract that although the then demand for said product exceeded the production rate, nevertheless due to various factors, “such demand may decrease or entirely cease, perhaps abruptly, forcing me (plaintiff) to cancel my production orders to you and that in any such event you may incur certain expenses and losses for canceling your then outstanding commitments for materials and purchased parts and in liquidating your finished and unfinished inventory then on hand. Under the above mentioned arrangement, I have assumed full responsibility for all such expenses and losses due to any such cancellations and agreed to reimburse and hold you harmless in respect thereof.”

The contract provided that a reserve fund of $35,000 be created and maintained to be at all times in the possession and under the control of defendant and available to it for the purpose of paying and reimbursing it for expense and loss incurred on account of canceling orders and liquidating inventory, in the event plaintiff should cancel production orders.

In order to create the reserve fund, plaintiff agreed to pay defendant the sum of ninety cents on account of each Kiddigig manufactured and shipped by it until such time as such payment accumulated a reserve fund of $35,000, provided that in the event the price of $3.50 per Kiddigig to plaintiff be increased, the ninety cents reserve fund payment should be decreased by the amount of such increase in price down to a minimum of sixty-eight cents.

As security for plaintiff’s obligations to defendant, he agreed to and did assign and transfer to defendant all present and future accounts receivable and invoices for Kid-digigs sold by him and manufactured and shipped by defendant.

All monies and checks received in payment of invoices to customers were to be deposited in a special account in the Northern Trust Company, Chicago, Illinois, in a special account in the name of “Juvenile Health Products Special Account.” Funds so deposited would be subject to withdrawal only upon checks signed by plaintiff and countersigned by a Comptroller. The expense of the employment of the Comptroller was to be borne by the plaintiff, and the Comptroller was to have access to all books, records and papers pertaining to the Kiddi-gig business.

[306]*3063. The entire lots of 6,000 and 30,000 Kiddigigs were manufactured and shipped to plaintiff’s customers. Invoices were paid by plaintiff substantially upon the 10th and 25th of each month up to and including the invoice of April 1, 1944. The amounts withdrawn and credited to the reserve fund deposited in the Northern Trust Company were as follows—

‘Date Received Amount Total

November 3, 1943 $9,345.94

December 10, 1943 8,922.28 $18,268.22

January 4, 1944 9,392.84 27,661.06

February 10, 1944 3.95 27,665.01

February 11, 1944 2,254.20 29,919.21

March 7,1944 97.92 30,017.13

April 5,1944 568.48 30,585.61

May 2,1944 47.60 30,633.21”

It is admitted that there was in the reserve fund at the time of the trial $30,-790.83.

In December 1943, 'believing that metal would become available for manufacture of baby carts and that the demand and salability of the Kiddigigs would be materially impaired, if not destroyed, production was discontinued at 78,000 units.

4. Between April 1 and July 1944, the plaintiff did not pay to the defendant the proceeds of sale of Kiddigigs shipped to his customers by the defendant and it is admitted by the parties that defendant is due from plaintiff $2,428.55 on this item.

5. On July 11, 1944, there remained on hand at defendant’s plant in Louisville, Kentucky, 18,896 Kiddigigs, for which there were no orders.

Correspondence and telephone conversations ensued in which the defendant was urging plaintiff to dispose of the Kiddigigs, defendant to deliver to the plaintiff or a warehouse of his choosing the Kiddigigs on hand at a price of $3.78 per unit.

Meanwhile, by agreement of the parties, rubber tires had been added, which increased the cost per unit to $4.15.

Defendant’s letter of July 11, 1944, was as follows—

“In accordance with our telephone conversation of today, we are offering you the opportunity of clearing up your account with us by the payment of $22,518.00 and our delivery to you or a warehouse of your choosing, 18500 Kiddigigs. This amount is made up as follows :

18,500 Kiddigigs @ 3.78 69,930

A/C Rec 6/27/44 3,432

Parts in Process 1,750

Storage Charges 2,331

$77,443

Cr. Kiddigigs a/c 30,633

Cr. Parker Pen a/c 29,600

' 60,233

Advances Parker Pen Parts 5,308

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Foy
369 A.2d 995 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 F. Supp. 304, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ressinger-v-adler-mfg-co-kywd-1950.