Ress v. Margolies
This text of 231 A.D. 843 (Ress v. Margolies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion to require plaintiffs to serve an amended complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten-dollars costs; the amended complaint to be served within ten days from the- entry- of' the order herein. If the .corpora-, tion be not made a party to the action it could, in the event that the' present plaintiffs did not succeed, bring a new action in its own name and thus subject defendant to a double harassment. The Corporation, while it may not be a necessary party, is, therefore, a proper party, and the refusal of the Special Term to direct service of an amended complaint was not a proper exercise of its discretion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ress-v-margolies-nyappdiv-1930.